What are your thoughts on a future where code is represented as a structured model, rather than text? Do you think that AI-powered coding assistants benefit from that?

These structures are made precisely to allow programs to “reason” about some parts of lower level meaning, and in many cases to rearrange the structure to preserve meaning but to make the eventual code that is generated more efficient.

plus(a, b) for(i, 1, x, […])

i.e. “operator like things” at the nodes …

6 early symptoms of fatty liver: What your body is telling you now - Times of India

in structures, such as:

Long ago in the 50s this was even thought of as a kind of “AI” and this association persisted into the 60s. Several Turing Awards were given for progress on this kind of “machine reasoning”.

+ for

Is T-Mobile secretly recording your phone's screen? How to check and turn it off - ZDNET

First, it’s worth noting that the “syntax recognition” phase of most compilers already does build a “structured model”, often in what used to be called a “canonical form” (an example of this might be a “pseudo-function tree” where every elementary process description is put into the same form — so both “a + b” and “for i := 1 to x do […]” are rendered as

It’s important to realize that “modern “AI” doesn’t understand human level meanings any better today (in many cases: worse!). So it is not going to be able to serve as much of a helper in a general coding assistant.

/ \ and ⁄ / | \

This supermassive black hole is eating way too quickly — and 'burping' at near-light speeds - Space

NOT DATA … BUT MEANING!

Most coding assistants — with or without “modern “AI” — also do reasoning and manipulation of structures.

a b i 1 x []

No. 2 Baseball comes up short against UTSA, 9-7 - University of Texas Athletics - University of Texas Athletics

A slogan that might help you get past the current fads is:

Another canonical form could be Lisp S-expressions, etc.